Chronic

David is a nurse who works with terminally ill patients. Dedicated to his profession, he develops strong relationships people he cares for. But outside of work, it's a different story altogether.

Letterboxd

Add a review

GoWatchIt

See more films

Reviews

  • ★★★★ review by Steven Sheehan on Letterboxd

    Michel Franco's camera is in no two minds about what he wants to reveal, challenging you to contemplate your own mortality, how far you have travelled and the unknown yet to come. Chronic is a film that confronts the anticlimax of our passing, the often undignified way our bodies fail us in the end and examines the particular mindset no doubt needed to become a private carer.

    For much of the film it questions David's (Tim Roth) motivation for undertaking such a gruelling line of work. He often goes above the call of duty, working double shifts and taking up his own time to be with his patients. It is here you begin to understand the unique bond created between a nurse and a terminally ill patient, the months spent together intimately close and co-dependent, while a lifetime spent with family becomes more distanced due to an inability to help, to cope, or sometimes even to care.

    David neutrally keeps to himself, always mysteriously calm and in service to those facing up to their final days. Not a facial or vocal tone falls out of place. But there is something not quite right, as assumed in the very first shot and slowly we begin to unravel why that may be. Our uncertainty grows further as he absorbs particular professional or personal traits of his patients, crossing over into uncomfortable waters. Roth is superb and I mean really superb, with one of his best performances in a very long time. Which is saying something given his consistency. Even when you can't discover who he is underneath the actions, he doesn't allow your suspicions to fully get the better of you.

    Franco's distilled, clinical like approach opens up long takes with no place to hide. Rooms become claustrophobic as naked bodies are washed down, blood, sweat and tears wiped away inside the static frame, seemingly cold and unemotional but affecting you in a completely opposite manner. Not much is learnt about David through his conversations, instead the shot composition lays out the questions for us to come to our own conclusions.

    A big problem for many, which I experienced myself, will be the ending. In the moment it feels misjudged and out of line with the tone so firmly set in place for the previous 90 minutes. No doubt it was done intentionally, so while you may feel cheated, it deserves some time to digest and reconsider, given the quality of the film up until that point. Hopefully it won't detract from a carefully made and compelling character study that looks at death and those caught in its throws, in an unflinching and unique way.

  • ★★★½ review by Brendan Michaels on Letterboxd

    7/10

    This film could have easily been great if it had better focus in certain areas. Tim Roth's performance is good as he's able to carry some great scenes. But for crying out loud that ending feels so unearned. It's shocking but it comes out of nowhere. Check it out for yourself but this only is here as evidence on how influential Michael Haneke is.



    Edit: Actually now that I think more about it I sort of like the ending.

  • ★★★½ review by Bailey 👒 on Letterboxd

    Leo who?? Where is vape dad's Oscar®???

  • ★★★★ review by Billy Langsworthy on Letterboxd

    A tough watch, but a deeply engaging one too.

    It doesn't have the regular gut punches of Franco's impressive After Lucia, but it gets under the skin and stays there.

    Impressive stuff.

  • ★★★★ review by Brian Koukol on Letterboxd

    Living on the receiving end of the sort of care portrayed in this film for the majority of my life, I don't seem to have experienced this film the same way that many others have. I didn't perceive Tim Roth's character as creepy or ambiguous at all, but rather chock-full of empathy. In any interview with a possible caregiver, my first question would be: "Will you watch porn with me or otherwise act as my arms in order to allow me to do something morally bankrupt without judgment or complaint?" If yes, then you're hired!

    I appreciate the relatively honest depiction of both debilitation and the codependent relationship that forms between giver and taker portrayed here. I also appreciate the amount of work required by me to put the pieces of this particular story together. What I don't appreciate, however, is the lazy, convenient ending. I see what writer/director Michel Franco was trying to convey with it, but it simply did not work for me. It didn't quite ruin the powerful film that came before it, but it came damn close.

    Despite my issues with its conclusion, however, I can't recommend this film enough.

  • See all reviews

Tweets